Law Office L60·Active·Examining since 2010
Rachel M. Arrison
3,793 applications analyzed
Analytics locked
Rachel Arrison is a USPTO trademark examining attorney in Law Office L60.
What subscribers see here
How every figure is computed →Substantive refusal
Goes Final after response
Withdrawn when contested
Difficulty
How hard a §2(d) is to overcome here, ranked against the active corps.
The full record on Rachel M. Arrison is one step away.
One subscription opens every active examiner.
Refusal groundsIndependent rates, don't sum to 100%
§2(d) confusion
Descriptive, surname & geo §2(e)
Other substantive
Filing → first office actionMedian · last 2 yrs · mostly queue time
Examiner's amendmentsShare of interventions where an amendment could work · last 2 yrs
Refusal rate by classColored vs the corps in the same class
ClassRefusal§2(d)§2(e)Other
Refusal rate by yearSubstantive refusals · per-year n · last 5 complete years
Fine print · complements & timing
Complements & allowanceContext figures.
Clean approvalNever went Final
Publication rateShare reaching publication, context only
Timing · fine printTiming is queue-bound, not examiner behavior · full record
Filing → first OAMedian · "when will we hear?"
TurnaroundMedian, response → next action
OA roundsAverage per refused app
First OA → publicationMedian
Filing → publicationMedian · "when will my mark be approved?"
Identity facts above are public record. The blurred figures are placeholders, identical on every profile and never this examiner's data; the real record behind them is computed from n=3,793 applications and published to subscribers.