Live exampleOne real examiner, identified by role and Law Office only, fully unlocked: the exact profile subscribers see on every active examiner. Every figure is computed from public USPTO records.
Open every examiner →A senior examiner
19,916 applications analyzedlast OA Sep 16, 2026
Why 7/10? ▾
Winnability vs the active examining corps: how hard to overcome once refused.
Holds after a response · 35% of score
Once refused, how often they push it to a Final rather than withdraw.
Won't withdraw post-Final · 25% of score
When applicants answer a Final §2(d), how rarely the refusal comes off.
Refusal rate (basis-adjusted) · 20% of score
Refuses more than expected for their filing-basis mix.
Sticks through TTAB appeal · 12% of score
When an applicant pursues a TTAB appeal, how often the refusal sticks.
Grinds extra rounds · 8% of score
More office-action rounds to reach resolution.
Weights renormalized over available signals.
Decile across active examiners, n≥30.
More difficult than 60% of active examiners.
Cites two or more grounds at once on 6% of ground-classified apps.
−6 days vs corps
345 of 1,188 amendment-eligible interventions
All 48 classes ▾
Refusal shading is green below the corps and red above it. Ground shading is neutral: depth marks distance from the typical examiner in that class, ▲ above and ▼ below.
The read: easing, gently: down about 5 points from 2021 to 2025.
Fine print · complements & timing
Data as of Sep 17, 2026 · Built on the public USPTO record
How every figure is computed →Your examiner has a record like this one.
One subscription opens the full profile on every active examiner: the assignment draw, the non-final odds, recovery after a Final, the Board record, and the §2(d) detail report. Search yours the moment you're in.