Law Office N30·Active·Examining since 2013
Justine N. Burke
6,997 applications analyzed
Analytics locked
Justine Burke is a USPTO trademark examining attorney in Law Office N30.
What subscribers see here
How every figure is computed →Substantive refusal
Goes Final after response
Withdrawn when contested
Difficulty
How hard a §2(d) is to overcome here, ranked against the active corps.
The full record on Justine N. Burke is one step away.
One subscription opens every active examiner.
Refusal groundsIndependent rates, don't sum to 100%
§2(d) confusion
Descriptive, surname & geo §2(e)
Other substantive
Filing → first office actionMedian · last 2 yrs · mostly queue time
Examiner's amendmentsShare of interventions where an amendment could work · last 2 yrs
Refusal rate by classColored vs the corps in the same class
ClassRefusal§2(d)§2(e)Other
Refusal rate by yearSubstantive refusals · per-year n · last 5 complete years
Fine print · complements & timing
Complements & allowanceContext figures.
Clean approvalNever went Final
Publication rateShare reaching publication, context only
Timing · fine printTiming is queue-bound, not examiner behavior · full record
Filing → first OAMedian · "when will we hear?"
TurnaroundMedian, response → next action
OA roundsAverage per refused app
First OA → publicationMedian
Filing → publicationMedian · "when will my mark be approved?"
Identity facts above are public record. The blurred figures are placeholders, identical on every profile and never this examiner's data; the real record behind them is computed from n=6,997 applications and published to subscribers.