Skip to main content

CrystalMark

Research.

Field notes from the examiner record: data stories on how USPTO trademark examiners behave. Drawn entirely from the public record and written for the docket.

Four briefs published12.6M applications in the recordEvery figure sourced

The latest brief

No. 01 · September 4, 2026 · 8 min read

The Luck of the Draw

Nobody picks their examiner. The one you draw moves the odds of a likelihood-of-confusion refusal coming off by about 19 points, case held constant.

46%

Refusal comes off, tenth percentile of the corps

66%

Refusal comes off, ninetieth percentile of the corps

4 in 5

Of the hardest tenth stayed in the hard half in 2024-25

Read the brief

The archive

Previously published research

How these briefs are made

About this research

Every brief is built, or rebuilt, the same way. We answer a question about examiner behavior from the public USPTO record. Then an adversarial pass tries to break the finding before it publishes. Most pieces carry a counter-hypothesis ledger, and every figure that reaches a page states where it came from.

Built from the public record. CrystalMark is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office or any of its employees.

The per-examiner version

Every brief here is corps-wide. The examiner on your application has their own numbers.

Every active examiner the record supports has the reads behind these briefs: refusal rates, what they refuse on, what has overcome them, and their record when appealed. Find the one on your application in the examiner directory.

Try free for 7 days